What we do, in detail

Authorisation, scope, third-party systems, and IT services.

Program 01 · Not inferred

Authorisation first

Authorisation is obtained in writing before any access, and is never inferred from a verbal request, an existing support contract, or the fact that someone handed over credentials. It also has to come from a person entitled to give it: a keen contact inside a business is not necessarily able to authorise testing of their employer's infrastructure. Establishing that is our job rather than theirs, and it occasionally slows a start by a day.

  • Before any access
  • In writing
  • From the right person
  • Never inferred

Start this program

Step 1 · The request

What is being asked for.

Step 2 · The authority

Who can actually authorise it.

Step 3 · The document

Signed before anything starts.

Step 4 · The access

Only then.

Step 1 · The list

What is in, named explicitly.

Step 2 · The window

When testing may occur.

Step 3 · The discovery

Reported, not pursued.

Step 4 · The extension

Agreed before, if at all.

Program 02 · Not a suggestion

Scope as a boundary

The agreed scope is the limit of the authorisation, which means activity outside it is unauthorised even though the engagement itself is authorised. So scope creep here is not a contractual irritation to be sorted out later, it is a step outside the thing making the work lawful. Assets discovered mid-engagement are reported rather than explored, and testing extends to them only after a written extension agreed in advance.

  • Written scope
  • Time windows set
  • Discoveries reported
  • Extensions in advance

Start this program

Program 03 · Your client cannot consent

Third-party systems

Where systems sit on infrastructure operated by somebody else, a client often cannot validly authorise testing of it, because it is not theirs to authorise. We require the consent of the party entitled to give it and compliance with whatever testing policy that party imposes. This gets skipped constantly, usually in good faith, and it is the most common way an otherwise careful engagement ends up unauthorised in part.

  • Provider consent
  • Policy respected
  • Checked first
  • Excluded if absent

Start this program

Step 1 · The estate

What sits where, and whose it is.

Step 2 · The owner

Who may actually authorise.

Step 3 · The policy

What the provider permits.

Step 4 · The decision

Included, or carved out.

Step 1 · The need

What actually has to happen.

Step 2 · The access

Defined and authorised.

Step 3 · The work

Within what was agreed.

Step 4 · The handover

Reported, with access closed.

Program 04 · Ordinary work too

IT services

Not all of this work is assessment. Ordinary technology services run on the same discipline about access: what we may touch, when and on whose authority. Where we process personal data on your behalf we act as your processor under a written agreement and you remain the controller. Findings go to you and are not published or passed on, and credentials encountered are handled only as the work requires.

  • Per engagement
  • Access defined
  • Processor agreement
  • Findings confidential

Start this program

Got something that needs looking at properly?

A free first conversation, with no obligation.